Memo...Australia
Published on May 20, 2004 By Pixter In International
So John Howard and Peter Costello think that their “family-friendly” budget is the answer to all our prayers. Once again they have missed the point. If they listened to the electorate even occasionally, they would realise that what people want is real maternity leave and child care options.

What we didn’t need to see was Peter Costello smirking his way through “popping out babies” jokes. Did he think that one up for himself or did a speech writer come up with that little gem? Anyone who has followed politics realises that John Howard is trapped in a 1950’s mindset. He truly believes in the old adage that a woman’s place is in the home. That Mum should be happily ensconced at home raising 2.6 kids while Dad goes out and works 9to5 as the breadwinner.

Mr Howard needs to lend his ear to the electorate and listen to what hey are asking for. If he did, he might find out that in order to have that “Great Australian Dream”, both Mum and Dad have to work, and it’s rarely 9to5. So Mr Costello, when Australian women begin popping out “One for your husband, one for your wife and one for your country”, are you going to give them an appropriate amount of maternity leave?

Unfortunately the dismantling approach the Howard government has when it comes to anything that relates to community has destroyed one option in child care. The community based child care centres that used to operate on a non-profit basis used to fill some of the void. However, the Howard government decided that these would be closed in favour of private centers, by cutting their funding in 1996. Now, in order for a working parent to obtain a child care placement, they have to be both cashed-up and forward thinking. Cashed up because child care is expensive and forward thinking because they need to put their name on a waiting list before they even contemplate having a child.

We have made some leaps forward with some employers granting paternity leave to their male employees. However, the point is still being missed. Along with those who do not plan to, or cannot have children.



Comments
on May 21, 2004
Good points.
The way I see it is your point on child care is just a small part of this governments ideology (and this governments ideology is John Howards ideology.) That ideology is firmly based in the conservative cult of the individual, this being that services are the individuals responsibility and government should be minimally involved. The idea of any sort of welfare from public health, public education or childcare is heresy. Of course welfare for the well off in the form of tax minimisation measures are to be encouraged: trusts, changes to capital gains tax rules, the GST, the latest tax changes all favour the well off at the expense of those less well off. Flat taxes like the GST are being brought in while scaled income tax rates are coming down (flat taxes always benefit the rich compared to the poor.)
There was much grumbling in reaction to the budget that more money was not spent on services (education, hospitals, childcare) but what people do not realise is that John Howard would rather stop breathing than give them more money.
What he doesnt realise is that the electorates wants and needs have changed, they do not want tax cuts as much as spending on services. Like the lumbering dinosaur he is he cannot change direction and his end is nigh.......